How to streamline Regulatory Change Management?
The Compendium of Evidence on the
Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention Project in the stewardship of
Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), University of Manchester
has revealed some interesting facts about Regulatory Change Management. There
have always been mixed opinions about the importance of regulations in the
industries and people are unable to come to a consensus. In order to get some
clarity and ascertain the impact of regulations on organizations, an endogenous growth approach,
developed by Carlin and Soskice in 2006 was employed. This approach allows for
the comparison of the negative effect of compliance costs with the dynamic
effect of regulations generating additional incentives for innovative
activities.
Regulations and
Innovation
The crux of the new approach lies in the
empirical methodology that it employs. Empirical analyses, which were already
known, were surveyed by employing a variety of methodological approaches,
databases, and results. Through the analysis, the short term and long term
impact of regulations have been revealed. The investigation has divulged that
short term impacts of regulations are often negative for innovation. However,
rules and regulations more than make up for their initial failings by serving
as great assets in the long run. There is an added incentive of spillover
benefits, which help in enhancing an organization’s structure and also drive
the uptake of innovation.
Most quantitative studies done by using the
empirical methodology haven’t been able to distinguish between the influences
of changes in the creation of rules, their implication, and the resultant
compliance of the companies. However, it has been found that the innovative
culture when inculcated in the operations of regulatory bodies promotes the
positive innovative impact of regulations.
Through the studies, the following proposals
for more innovation-friendly and innovative targeting regulatory policies can
be deduced:
- Optimize the frequency and
timing of reviewing existing regulations.
- Strengthen the focus on
innovation while creating regulatory policy.
- Enhance the quality of the
regulatory framework that is directed at innovation.
Regulations and
Economics
The definition of regulations by OECD in 1997
states that regulation is the implementation of rules by public authorities and
governmental bodies in order to influence market activity and the behavior of
private actors in the economy.
In order to structure the argument for economic
regulations, we distinguish between the different subcategories:
Regulation of
Competition
The policies that are devised with the purpose
of enhancing competition increase the incentives for companies to invest in
innovative activities. When the competition is within a certain limit, it can
have a positive effect; however, when it becomes uncontained, and imitation
becomes a better option than innovation due to its lower costs, it can have a
negative effect.
Market Entry
Regulations
The regulations created for keeping a check on
the entry of new businesses are very important to prevent the integrity of the
industry. It is best to thwart the efforts of the inefficient entrepreneur who
can do more harm to the industry than any good to its reputation. These regulations
also work in favor of the already established businesses that prefer a lower
level of competition and want to restrict the entry of new businessmen.
However, this approach lowers the competition and diminishes the innovative
performance in the market. Through an analysis, it was discovered that
incumbents’ growth and patenting is positively linked with the lagged foreign
firm entry. But this is only valid in technologically advanced industries. It
is still required for backward industries to promote the growth of new entrants
to leverage innovation via competition.
Use of Artificial
Intelligence (AI) for Handling Regulatory Change Management
From the aforementioned analysis, we can
clearly see that it is hard to figure out a standard approach for regulatory
management that is beneficial to all. Using rudimentary tools and methods for
governance, risk and compliance (GRC) do not hold any value in today’s dynamic
industrial landscape. It is best to utilize an AI-powered solution that can
learn trends and predicts patterns and ultimately helps you in making critical
decisions that are innovative and economically viable at the same time.
In order to streamline Regulatory Change Management System,
you can procure Predict360’s Regulatory Change Management Software. It is
licensable as a standalone web-based application and can also be procured as
part of an integrated regulatory change management and learning management
solution.
For more information about Regulatory
Change Management Software and how it can be further enhanced as part
of an integrated risk and compliance management suite,
visit http://www.360factors.com/
Leave a Comment